Most Twitter users have been exposed to one instance or another of hashtag hijacking: be it a spam tweet making its way onto an event’s Twitter wall, or a critical tweet posted in an otherwise self-congratulatory community stream, hashtag hijacking is now a common practice in the shark-infested waters of social marketing campaigns.While spambots usually can be managed through careful content curation and reporting mechanisms, sentient users who choose to tweet with a hashtag for purposes other than those intended by the creator—or those who try to shift the conversation onto a different, problematic hashtag—can be trickier to deal with.
Selecting a good hashtag
There are many best practices for selecting a good hashtag to suggest for community use. Keep in mind that often several competing hashtags will emerge, and gradually the community will choose one that seems to work best—a choice often based on character count, attractiveness, popularity, key influencer adoption and ease of identification.
If you are going to pitch a hashtag to the community for use, it is important to consider how your hashtag will be received, especially in choosing the wording.
When Kathryn Marshall of Ethical Oil began tweeting about the new hashtag #oilsandspride, she no doubt intended it to be a vehicle for outreach and promotion through which users could express their support for Canadian oil products.
But Twitter users quickly began associating the hashtag with another well-known context of the word pride. I don’t think that the creators were thinking of jokes about rainbow parade floats or massage parlours in San Francisco when they created the hashtag, but that’s what happened.
This illustrates one of the most important practices in selecting a good hashtag: considering other perspectives. Not everyone thinks of Alberta when they hear “oil” and “pride” together, so it is important to pitch your hashtag to individuals outside your communications or PR team. Alternatively, you could propose a few hashtags to the community of users and see what best attracts the kind of content you are looking to encourage.
To quote Rob Townsend: “Social media campaigns exist in the same reality as every other type of message going out about your brand—so be acutely aware of how your campaigns can be misused.”
Twitter does not exist in a vacuum
Speaking of misuse…
A brand’s social media activities are obviously related to its overall PR presence, and the two are co-dependent. Embarking on a Twitter campaign is not an easy Band-Aid fix for a PR crisis—rather it will simply give those with complaints a larger and faster platform on which to air their grievances, as occurred with Quantas Airways this past November.
At the same time, the brand has the opportunity to expose itself to these complaints and to show the community how it responds, so though fraught with potential risks, incorporating Twitter into a crisis communications plan can be a good way to apologize or to shift public discourse after an embarrassing mistake. Besides, very little is worse than saying nothing at all, as I mentioned in my post on crisis communications last April.
The bottom line is that when dealing with hashtag hijacking, you need to be aware of existing pressures, not only on your own brand but also on the environments in which your brand exists.
Responding to Criticism
There are a variety of approaches to dealing with a hashtag hijacking. In some cases, as with Nickelback’s response to #nickelback insults, it can be effective to respond in a snarky or irreverent fashion, directly addressing the critiques of the hijackers or poking fun.
However, not every brand is free to openly mock their haters. When McDonalds experienced the hijacking of their #McDStories campaign, it would not have been wise to make light of some users’ concerns.
In a situation such as this, McDonalds was presented with a great opportunity to challenge users’ assumptions, showcase less well-known menu options, and confront false allegations—as it did in a lengthy Twitter exchange with PETA.
A hashjacking is not the end of the world for a PR campaign. To return to the #oilsandspride example, we can see that most of the users making gay jokes quickly grew bored and left, whereas the community using the hashtag as intended is steadily growing.
Those who are using the tag to air their ethical and environmental objections the oil sands remain, though, and show no signs of slowing. In a move bearing striking resemblance to the infamous @BPGlobalPR joke account, someone has created @OilSandsPride and @Ethical__Oil (with two underscores versus one), neither of which seems to advance the agenda intended by the hashtag’s creators, shall we say.
This brings us back to selecting a good hashtag in the first place. Not only is it important to consider different connotations of the words used, it is also important to consider accuracy.
Your hashtag should further your message as intended. The goal is promoting the interests of Canadian oil, rather than the oil sands themselves. While #oilsandspride is being used to distribute information about jobs, community involvement and the boycotting of conflict crude, the initiative might have made itself less of a target to criticism if it proliferated such messages under a hashtag emphasizing something other than the campaign’s most controversial component, such as #CanOil or #CanadianOil or something similar.
Exploring alternatives
Eventually, a brand may decide to explore the possibility of an alternative hashtag. In this event, it is likely that users are already one step ahead. If a Twitter hashtag has been hijacked for purposes other than those which interested users had been lead to believe, expect them to create their own alternative.
Brands can build on this initiative and embrace a user-created hashtag in the event that their own is—for whatever reason—not working out the way they had planned. This can be a great way to identify your dedicated community of followers, and to reward their involvement.
However, sometimes users will suggest alternative hashtags (or even begin moving tweets away from your hashtag onto another) that are not compatible with your goals. For example, users may be tweeting with a hashtag that has politically sensitive connotations.
In a situation such as this, explaining why you chose the hashtag you did and why you might not embrace the use of the alternative can be helpful. Do not frame this as a criticism of the users: rather emphasize that you wish to be part of the conversation but do not feel comfortable using a particular term.
If your brand cannot publicly address the reasons why you will not support a certain user-suggested hashtag, it is still imperative that you monitor its activity. Replying to user’s posts and employing your own hashtag in the reply can be a useful way to draw attention to your own hashtag, but at the end of the day you cannot force anything.
Users will follow the hashtags that distribute the most timely, valuable and interesting commentary and information. If you want your hashtag to succeed over another, bring your best game to the field.
Image via Vertical Measures






